Treatment Of Active Ulcerative Colitis Research Articles

To Determine the Frequency of Clinical Remission Induction with Versus without Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Ulcerative colitis is a long lasting inflammatory disease of the intestines that gets worse over time. Objective:. The goal of this study was to compare the success rates of inducing clinical remission in patients with active Ulcerative Colitis who underwent treatment with or without Fecal Microbiota Transplant. Methods: It was a Randomized Controlled Trial, which was done in Department of Gastroenterology/Medical Unit II of Jinnah Hospital Lahore .Study duration was 18months (from 01-01-2021 to 30-06-2022). The research included 90 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. Standard Ulcerative Colitis therapy was given to both groups. Patients in group A recieved  once-weekly faecal microbiota transplant for a period of six weeks. Patients in group B had weekly water enemas for same period. All patients underwent colonoscopy and Mayo score was noted before treatment, and after 6 weeks of treatment. Clinical remission was labeled if patients achieved Mayo score £2 after treatment. Results: Group A (Treatment) had a mean age of 39.31 ±13.45 and group B (Control) had a mean age of 38.59 ±12.11 (p=0.52). Duration of ulcerative colitis in group A was 8.08±2.64 weeks and in group B was 9.00±2.62 weeks (p=0.76). Pre-treatment Mayo score in groups A and B, were 8.29±1.91in  and 8.73 ±1.61 respectively (p=0.15). Post-treatment in group A, the Mayo score was 3.71± 2.22, whereas in group B, it was 5.07± 1.75 (p=0.003). Remission was achieved in 24.44% (n=11) in fecal microbiota transplant group and 8.88% (n=4) in control group. (p=0.003). Conclusion: When compared to the control group, FMT significantly induces remission in patients with active UC.

Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Herbal medicines are used by patients with IBD despite limited evidence. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating treatment with herbal medicines in active ulcerative colitis (UC). A search query designed by a library informationist was used to identify potential articles for inclusion. Articles were screened and data were extracted by at least two investigators. Outcomes of interest included clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and safety. We identified 28 RCTs for 18 herbs. In pooled analyses, when compared with placebo, clinical response rates were significantly higher for Indigo naturalis (IN) (RR 3.70, 95% CI 1.97-6.95), but not for Curcuma longa (CL) (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.99-2.58) or Andrographis paniculata (AP) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.26). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical remission for CL (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.18-5.63), but not for AP (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.86-2.01). Higher rates of endoscopic response (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.26) and remission (RR 19.37, 95% CI 2.71-138.42) were significant for CL. CL has evidence supporting its use as an adjuvant therapy in active UC. Research with larger scale and well-designed RCTs, manufacturing regulations, and education are needed.

Patient preferences for active ulcerative colitis treatments and fecal microbiota transplantation.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Understanding patient preferences can identify treatment features that may impact treatment decisions, improve shared decision-making, and contribute to patient-centered care, which is especially important in the context of novel treatments like FMT. We aimed to quantify preferences for active UC treatments, specifically FMT and biologics, and identify patient characteristics associated with different preference patterns. This is a cross-sectional survey study. We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey to elicit preferences in a sample of Canadian adults with UC. DCE data were analyzed using a main-effects mixed logit model and used to predict uptake of hypothetical scenarios reflecting alternative combinations of treatment features. Latent class modeling identified heterogeneity in patient preference patterns. Participants' (n = 201) mean age was 47.1 years (SD: 14.5 years), 58% were female, and most (84%) had at least some post-secondary education. Almost half were willing to undergo FMT. When considering treatments for active UC, the most important attributes were chance of remission and severity of rare unknown side effects. All else equal, participants were most likely to uptake treatment that involves oral capsules/pills. Participants in the class with the highest utility for chance of remission were younger, had more severe disease, and 58% indicated that they would be willing to undergo FMT. We identified characteristics of UC patients who are more likely to be interested in FMT using preference elicitation methods. Patient-centered care can be enhanced by knowing which patients are more likely to be interested in FMT, potentially improving satisfaction with and adherence to treatments for active UC to maximize the effectiveness of treatment while considering heterogeneity in patient preferences.

Constructing a screening model to obtain the functional herbs for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis based on herb-compound-target network and immuno-infiltration analysis.

The therapeutic effect of most traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) on ulcerative colitis is unclear, The objective of this study was to develop a core herbal screening model aimed at facilitating the transition from active ulcerative colitis (UC) to inactive. We obtained the gene expression dataset GSE75214 for UC from the GEO database and analysed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between active and inactive groups. Gene modules associated with the active group were screened using WGCNA, and immune-related genes (IRGs) were obtained from the ImmPort database. The TCMSP database was utilized to acquire the herb-molecule-target network and identify the herb-related targets (HRT). We performed intersection operations on HRTs, DEGs, IRGs, and module genes to identify candidate genes and conducted enrichment analyses. Subsequently, three machine learning algorithms (SVM-REF analysis, Random Forest analysis, and LASSO regression analysis) were employed to refine the hubgene from the candidate genes. Based on the hub genes identified in this study, we conducted compound and herb matching and further screened herbs related to abdominal pain and blood in stool using the Symmap database.Besides, the stability between molecules and targets were assessed using molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation methods. An intersection operation was performed on HRT, DEGs, IRGs, and module genes, leading to the identification of 23 candidate genes. Utilizing three algorithms (RandomForest, SVM-REF, and LASSO) for analyzing the candidate genes and identifying the intersection, we identified five core targets (CXCL2, DUOX2, LYZ, MMP9, and AGT) and 243 associated herbs. Hedysarum Multijugum Maxim. (Huangqi), Sophorae Flavescentis Radix (Kushen), Cotyledon Fimbriata Turcz. (Wasong), and Granati Pericarpium (Shiliupi) were found to be capable of relieving abdominal pain and hematochezia during active UC. Molecular docking demonstrated that the compounds of the four aforementioned herbs showed positive docking activity with their core targets. The results of molecular dynamic simulations indicated that well-docked active molecules had a more stable structure when bound to their target complexes. The study has shed light on the potential of TCMs in treating active UC from an immunomodulatory perspective, consequently, 5 core targets and 4 key herbs has been identified. These findings can provide a theoretical basis for subsequent management and treatment of active UC with TCM, as well as offer original ideas for further research and development of innovative drugs for alleviating UC.

Development and multiple visualization methods for the therapeutic effects prediction model of five-flavor Sophora Flavescens enteric-coated capsules in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: A study on model development and result visualization

Development and multiple visualization methods for the therapeutic effects prediction model of five-flavor Sophora Flavescens enteric-coated capsules in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: A study on model development and result visualization

Budesonide-liposomes inclusion complex in thermosensitive gel alleviates DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in mice

Purpose A novel formulation for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment by rectal administration with budesonide liposomes (Bud Lip) and thermosensitive gel (Gel) was developed for future clinical use. To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity and colon mucosal protection of this novel formulation compared with the other three in mice. Methods Bud Lip was prepared by reverse evaporation method and then dispersed in solutions with PL407 and PL188 by a cold method. Male mice were induced to UC by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) and were treated for 14 days by rectal administration, as follows: Bud enema (a conventional suspension formulation); Bud Lip; Bud Gel; Bud Lip-Gel; saline. And a negative control without colitis was also used. Disease activity index (DAI), and macroscopic and microscopic damage scores in colon tissues were used to evaluate the effect of therapy. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in serum and the concentrations of TNF-α and IL-10 and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in colon tissue were also introduced. Results In UC mice model, Bud Lip-Gel showed inflammation was alleviated significantly, and the treatment was highly associated with lower DAI, less macroscopic and microscopic colonic damage and downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 and MPO. Bud Lip-Gel had advantages over Bud, Bud Lip, Bud Gel in the treatment of active UC. Conclusion Novel Bud liposomes complex in thermosensitive Gel effectively mitigated symptoms, alleviated macroscopic and microscopic colon damage, and reduced inflammatory reaction in UC mice, which might be a potential strategy for UC treatment.

A critical review of ustekinumab for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis in adults

ABSTRACT Introduction Ustekinumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody, targeting the p40 subunit common to both human interleukin 12 and 23, approved by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Areas covered In this review, the results of the phase 3 UNIFI and the real-world studies assessing the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis are discussed, as well as limitations of these studies. Predictive factors of response, the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring and the positioning of ustekinumab in specific situations are also addressed. Finally, in the light of data presented, the positioning of ustekinumab in the therapeutic algorithm of ulcerative colitis will also be considered. Expert opinion Ustekinumab has been shown to be effective to induce and maintain clinical, endoscopic and histologic remission in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis both in phase 3 and real-world studies, with a favorable safety profile. Overall, its favorable risk–benefit ratio, its efficacy on extra-intestinal manifestations and in biologics failure patients make ustekinumab an ideal candidate as first, second, or third-line therapy in ulcerative colitis.

Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for the induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BackgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel management strategy for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its effectiveness remains controversial. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of FMT in the treatment of active UC by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsWe searched the Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 2021. RCTs that recruited patients with active UC and treated them with FMT, a placebo or a suitable comparator were included in the meta-analysis. PICOS: Patients, active UC; Intervention, FMT; Control, placebo or a suitable comparator; Outcomes, remission rate; Studies, RCTs. The risk of bias assessment was performed with Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2). Meta-analyses of risk ratios (RRs) were performed to estimate the differences in remission rates and the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) between the FMT-treated and control patients.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs comprising 425 UC patients (213 FMT and 212 control) were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was low in these RCTs. Clinical remission was observed in 86 of the 213 patients in the FMT groups and 47 of the 212 patients in the control groups [RR: 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37, 2.47; P<0.0001]. Clinical remission was better when the FMT delivery route was via the lower gut, the FMT dose was >300 grams, and the fecal specimen from multiple donors. Endoscopic remission (observed in 7 RCTs) was achieved in 33 of the 195 FMT-treated patients compared to 17 of the 194 control patients (RR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.31; P=0.01). SAEs were reported in 22 of the 213 FMT-treated patients but only 11 of the 212 control patients (RR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.03, 4.09; P=0.04).DiscussionFMT is an effective treatment for patients with active UC. Significantly higher clinical and endoscopic remission rates are observed with FMT than with control treatments. However, FMT may cause a significantly higher incidence of SAEs than control treatments. Future studies should delineate the effects of donor selection, dosage, delivery route, and antibiotic pretreatment and should evaluate the safety profile of FMT.

Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been investigated as a treatment option for patients with inflammatory bowel disease with controversial results.We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of FMT in patients with ulcerative colitis. Double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adult patients with active ulcerative colitis who received either FMT or placebo were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included the rate of combined clinical and endoscopic remission, endoscopic remission or response, clinical remission or response, and specific adverse events. The results were pooled together using Reviewer Manager 5.4 software. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. Six RCTs involving 324 patients were included. Our findings demonstrate that compared with placebo, FMT has significant benefit in inducing combined clinical and endoscopic remission (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-7.72; P < .0001). Subgroup analyses of influencing factors showed no differences between pooled or single stool donors (P = .71), fresh or frozen FMT (P = .35), and different routes or frequencies of delivery (P = .80 and .48, respectively). Pre-FMT antibiotics, bowel lavage, concomitant biologic therapy, and topical rectal therapy did not affect combined remission rates (P values of .47, .38, .28, and .40, respectively). Clinical remission or response and endoscopic remission or response were significantly higher in patients who received FMT compared with placebo (P < .05) without any differences in serious or specific adverse events. FMT demonstrated a clinical and endoscopic benefit in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis, with a comparable safety profile to placebo. Future RCTs are required to standardize study protocols and examine data on maintenance therapy.

Тактика ведения пациентов с язвенным колитом, не ответивших на лечение анти-ФНО

Effective methods of treating UC patients is one of the most important problems. The inclusion of biological drugs in clinical practice leads to an improvement in the treatment of moderate and severe UC, but from 10 to 20% of patients lose their response within a year, which leads to the need to optimize the dose or switch to another drug. The use of janus kinase inhibitors – a new class of targeted synthetic drugs for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis – allows for a rapid clinical response when switching from TNF-α inhibitors. Pronounced clinical efficacy is usually observed 2-8 weeks after the start of treatment. A clinical case of a patient with ulcerative colitis who did not respond to treatment with anti-TNF is presented. Modern approaches to the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and treatment tactics are reflected, as well as therapeutic possibilities for overcoming the secondary inefficiency of TNF inhibitors by using janus kinase inhibitors

Lyophilised oral faecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis (LOTUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) delivered via colonoscopic infusion or enemas have been shown to induce remission in a proportion of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Whether orally administered FMT is effective in ulcerative colitis is unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of oral lyophilised FMT for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at two centres in Australia. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with active ulcerative colitis (defined as clinical and endoscopic active ulcerative colitis, with a total Mayo score of 4-10, and a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥1). After 2 weeks of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and doxycycline, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral lyophilised FMT or placebo capsules for 8 weeks, using a prespecified computer-generated randomisation list with a permuted block size of 8. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic remission or response (total Mayo score ≤2, all subscores ≤1, and ≥1 point reduction in endoscopic subscore) at week 8. At week 8, FMT responders were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio, permuted block size of 8) to either continue or withdraw FMT for a further 48 weeks. Analyses were done by modified intention-to-treat, including all patients who received at least one study dose. This trial is registered with Australian New Zealand Trial Registry, number ACTRN 12619000611123; this is the final report of the trial. Between May 20, 2019, and March 24, 2020, 35 patients were randomly assigned: 15 to receive FMT and 20 to receive placebo. Recruitment was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At week 8, eight (53%) of 15 patients in the FMT group were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic remission or response, as were three (15%) of 20 patients in the placebo group (difference 38·3%, 95% CI 8·6-68·0; p=0·027; odds ratio 5·0, 95% CI 1·8-14·1). Adverse events occurred in 10 (67%) patients in the FMT group and 17 (85%) of those in the placebo group during the 8-week induction period, and were generally mild and self-limiting gastrointestinal complaints. Serious adverse events included worsening ulcerative colitis (two in the FMT group, one in the placebo group) and per-rectal bleeding (one in the placebo group). Ten patients in the FMT group who achieved a clinical or endoscopic response entered the maintenance phase and were randomly assigned to continue open-label FMT (n=4) or withdraw therapy (n=6). All four (100%) patients who continued FMT were in clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission at week 56 compared with none of the patients who had FMT withdrawn. Antibiotics followed by orally administered FMT was associated with the induction of remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Continuing FMT was well tolerated and appeared to demonstrate clinical, endoscopic, and histological efficacy. Oral FMT could be a promising and feasible treatment option for patients with ulcerative colitis. St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, Gutsy Group.

Identification of Pharmacological Autophagy Regulators of Active Ulcerative Colitis.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic recurrent disease of unknown etiology. Recently, it has been reported that autophagy-related gene polymorphism is closely associated with increased risk of UC, and the therapeutic effect of some UC drugs is mediated by regulating autophagy pathways. This study aims to identify pivotal autophagy-related regulators in UC pathogenesis and provide novel molecular targets for the treatment of active UC. Methods: Gene expression profiles and clinical information of active UC patients were obtained from GEO databases. CIBERSORT was adopted to evaluate the immune cell infiltration. We used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential expression analysis to identify the pivotal modules and genes associated with active UC. Subsequently, we conducted validation in the validation set and explored its relationship with commonly used UC therapeutics. Results: 36 healthy controls and 46 active UC patients have been obtained from the training set of GSE53306, GSE87466, and GSE134025. There were 423 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found, which dramatically enriched in autophagy-related pathways. And more infiltration of mast cells, activated T cells, dendritic cells, and M1 macrophages were observed in the intestinal mucosa of active UC, while more infiltration of resting immune cells and M2 macrophages in healthy controls. WGCNA indicated that the turquoise and blue modules were the critical modules. CASP1, SERPINA1, and CCL2 have been identified as the hub autophagy-related genes of active UC, after combining DEGs and 232 autophagy-related genes from HADb with the genes of turquoise and blue modules, respectively. We further verified that CASP1, SERPINA1, and CCL2 were positively associated with active UC and served as an autophagy-related biomarker for active UC. Moreover, increased SERPINA1 in the involved intestinal mucosa was reduced in patients with active UC who responded to golimumab or glucocorticoid therapy. But, neither CASP1, SERPINA1, and CCL2 were changed by treatment of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and azathioprine. Conclusion: CASP1, SERPINA1, and CCL2 are autophagy-related hub genes of active UC. And SERPINA1 may serve as a new pharmacological autophagy regulator of UC, which provides a new target for the use of small molecules targeting autophagy in the treatment of active UC.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as Therapy for Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aim Increasing evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment against recurrent Clostridium difficile infection; however, its efficacy in UC is still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT for treatment of active UC. Methods We searched Cochrane, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with active UC, which compared FMT with controls, were eligible. The primary outcome was combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and serious adverse events. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) is reported. Results Five RCTs with 292 participants were eligible for inclusion. When data were pooled for all patients, FMT was associated with a higher combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response; the RR of combined outcome not achieving after FMT vs. control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.88). FMT delivered via lower gastrointestinal route was superior to upper gastrointestinal route with regard to combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89). FMT with pooled donor stool (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85) and higher frequency of administration (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.93) may be more effective with regard to clinical remission. There was no statistically significant difference in serious adverse events with FMT compared with controls (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03). Conclusion FMT shows a promising perspective with comparable safety and favorable clinical efficacy for the treatment of active UC in the short term. However, further larger, more rigorously conducted RCTs of FMT in UC are still needed in order to resolve the controversial questions.

A177 METHOTREXATE FOR THE INDUCTION OF REMISSION IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

Abstract Background Obtaining steroid-free remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a clinically important parameter that can mitigate the development of disease-related complications and lead to improved quality of life. Aims A systematic review to assess the effects and safety of methotrexate for induction in patients with UC. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL were searched from inception to August 20, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing methotrexate with placebo or an active comparator in patients with active ulcerative colitis were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission and withdrawal from steroids as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the total number of patients randomized (intention-to-treat analysis). The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcome was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Results Three studies (n=212) were included in the review. Two studies were randomized controlled trials comparing methotrexate to placebo for induction of remission of active ulcerative colitis. The first study (n = 67) compared oral methotrexate (12.5 mg/week) to placebo. Forty-seven percent (14/30) of methotrexate patients achieved clinical remission and complete withdrawal from steroids during the study period compared to 49% (18/37) of placebo patients (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.59). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data. The second study (n=111) compared subcutaneous/intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/week to placebo. The primary outcome, steroid-free remission at week 16, was present in 32% (19/60) of patients on methotrexate in comparison to 20%(10/51) of patients in the placebo arm (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.83 to 3.15; P-value of 0.15). A GRADE analysis indicated downgrading of the evidence to low given very sparse data (29 events). An additional head-to-head randomised controlled study (n = 34) compared oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) to 6-mercaptopurine (1.5 mg/kg/day) and 5-aminosalicylic acid (3 g/day). This final study was judged to be at high risk of bias due to an open-label design. At 30 weeks, 58% (7/12) of methotrexate patients achieved clinical remission and withdrawal from steroids compared to 79% (11/14) of 6-mercaptopurine patients (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.29) and 25% (2/8) of 5-aminosalicylic acid patients (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 8.49). GRADE analyses indicated that the overall quality of the evidence was very low due to very sparse data and high risk of bias. Conclusions Methotrexate demonstrated no benefit over placebo or active comparators for the induction of steroid-free remission. Future research is ongoing to explore the utility of combination therapy with monoclonal antibody biologic therapy for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Funding Agencies None

Enema based therapy using liposomal formulation of low molecular weight heparin for treatment of active ulcerative colitis: New adjunct therapeutic opportunity

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic bowel disease involving chronic inflammation and ulcers in colon and implicates severe epithelial damage with disruption in colon homeostasis. Presently existing treatments possess serious concerns like off target effects and adverse reactions, drug inactivation, poor absorption and other complications resulting in poor bioavailability. In context of high risk of thrombotic events in UC patients, heparin can offer appreciable benefits in UC management due to its remarkable anti-coagulating properties, its ability to intervene inflammatory pathways and acceleration of wound healing process. However, oral administration of heparin being impractical due to harsh gastric acidic environment and heparin degradation, conventional heparin administration is done via intravenous route. Present study was designed to formulate, characterize and evaluate sustained release heparin formulation in mice model of experimental colitis. Heparin liposomes (HLp) were formulated by solvent evaporation and extrusion process and possessed hydrodynamic diameter of 242 ± 4.3 nm. Size, shape and surface morphology was confirmed by TEM, SEM and AFM micrographs while encapsulation efficiency and loading of heparin in optimized HLp were 59.61% and 12.27%, respectively. HLp enema administration ameliorated gross disease indices like body weight, colon length, stool consistency, fecal occult blood. Further, anti-inflammatory efficacy of HLp was established in histopathological analysis where HLp appreciably restored protective mucin layer, colon epithelial mucosal histoarchitecture and considerably attenuated mast cell infiltration in colon epithelia. Overall, results of this study indicate that HLp demonstrated an appreciable therapeutic efficacy in experimental colitis and these results are attributed to their ability to suppress inflammation.

Safety and efficacy of single-needle leukocyte apheresis for treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Leukocyte apheresis (LCAP) is a safe and effective treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. Nevertheless, a limitation of LCAP is its requirement for two puncture sites (double-needle [DN] apheresis), sometimes leading to problems with needle puncture. Single-needle (SN) apheresis is useful in hemodialysis and reduces needle puncture pain. If SN apheresis were found to be useful in LCAP for UC, it may reduce patient burden. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SN apheresis with that of DN apheresis. Twenty-four patients with active UC were retrospectively enrolled. They underwent either SN apheresis (n = 12) or conventional double-needle (DN) apheresis (n = 12) at the Kurume University Hospital from February 2014 to March 2018. At each session, we recorded access problems defined by the time required to initiate apheresis and the frequency of puncture-related problems, as well as blood circuit clotting, defined as clotting necessitating interruption of apheresis and changing of the circuit. Efficacy was assessed using partial Mayo scores. The number of apheresis sessions was comparable between SN and DN apheresis (9.0 ± 2.0 times vs 9.6 ± 1.4 times, mean ± SEM). SN significantly reduced the time required to start apheresis (10.0 ± 5.4 minutes vs 19.4 ± 11.9 minutes, P < .05) as well as needle puncture troubles (0.9% vs 11.5%, P < .05). SN had comparable frequency of blood clotting episodes (5.6% vs 8.7%). SN apheresis had similar clinical efficacy (P < .001 in SN and P < .01 in DN). The improvement and remission rates were comparable between groups. SN apheresis may be safe and effective and may reduce patient burden during UC treatment. Nevertheless, further comparative studies are needed.

Efficacy and mechanism of Hudi enteric-coated capsules combined with beclomethasone dipropionate enema in treatment of active ulcerative colitis

Efficacy and mechanism of Hudi enteric-coated capsules combined with beclomethasone dipropionate enema in treatment of active ulcerative colitis

Food Effect on a Single High Dose of Carotegrast Methyl, an Oral Antagonist of α4-Integrin, in Healthy Male Subjects: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Background and ObjectivesCarotegrast methyl, a novel prodrug, oral antagonist of α4-integrin, is in development for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as the safety profile after a single dose of carotegrast methyl in healthy male subjects.MethodsSubjects were randomised to receive a single dose of carotegrast methyl (240, 480 or 960 mg) or placebo in a 6:2 ratio and received the study drug under both fed and fasted conditions separated by an 8-day washout. The pharmacokinetic profiles of carotegrast methyl and its active metabolite, carotegrast, were assessed. The pharmacodynamic profile was evaluated according to a change in the peripheral lymphocyte count. Safety was monitored throughout.ResultsBased on the area under the time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), food reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast by 21–57% and 5–29%, respectively. The fed-to-fasted ratio of least square means for the increase in the lymphocyte count was almost at unity in each dose, indicating no food effect on pharmacodynamics. The time  ≥ 90% of maximum effect was prolonged dose dependently, suggesting that a 960 mg-dose can provide a long-lasting effect. Reported adverse events were all mild.ConclusionsDespite the reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast, food had no effect on the increase in lymphocyte count. A single administration of carotegrast methyl up to 960 mg was found to be safe.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-019-00879-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diet Intervention Treatment for Active Ulcerative Colitis

Diet Intervention Treatment for Active Ulcerative Colitis

Shorter Relapse-Free Period after Leukocyte Removal Therapy in Younger than Older Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Leukocyte removal therapy (LRT) is an effective treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). The present study was performed to evaluate the relapse-free period after LRT and identify risk factors for relapse. Methods: In total, 94 patients who underwent first-time LRT for remission of moderate to severe UC from April 2004 to March 2016 were enrolled in the present study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments: leukocytapheresis (LCAP; n = 43) or granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage adsorptive apheresis (GMA; n = 51). The 5-year cumulative relapse-free rate and risk factors for relapse were evaluated. Results: The therapeutic response rate was 82% for GMA and 70% for LCAP without a statistically significant difference. The 5-year relapse-free rate was 34.7% in the LRT group. The 5-year relapse-free rate in patients aged > 40 years was 49.9%, which was significantly higher than that in patients aged ≤40 years (22.9%, p < 0.01). The relapse-free period was longer in the older than younger patients. Conclusions: The relapse-free period after LRT was examined in patients with UC, and 34.7% of patients achieved clinical remission within a 5-year period. The risk factor for early relapse after LRT was younger age.